A judicial restraint on public comment regarding a sub judice defamation case primarily balances which two rights?

💡 Explanation:

A court order imposing a temporary restraint (interim injunction or 'gag order') on public statements in a sub judice defamation case is an exercise of judicial discretion. It balances the fundamental right to freedom of expression with the right to dignity and reputation. This restraint is often deemed a 'reasonable restriction' on free speech to prevent irreparable harm to a person's reputation while the matter is under judicial consideration.